Europe: Growth expectations fall in the Autumn Economic Forecast, but help is on the way

November 16, 2020

The eurozone recorded its fastest rate of expansion since records began in 1995 in the third quarter, but the European Commission took the gilt off the gingerbread by revising down its growth forecasts shortly after, pointing to the pandemic’s resurgence. Nonetheless, more fiscal and monetary support is forthcoming.

Quarter-on-quarter, the eurozone economy expanded 12.7% in Q3, versus 9.4% expected, but a new series of lockdowns, curfews and restrictive measures threatens to put a spanner in the works. As Maarten Verwey, European Director General Economic and Financial Affairs comments, ‘The combination of renewed fear about the spread of the disease and lockdown measures is weighing on economic activity in the short run and putting the nascent recovery on hold.’ While, the EU commissioner, Paolo Gentiloni said: ‘Growth will stall in the fourth quarter and pick up in the first part of 2021.’

A recovery on ice is much better than a recovery falling into reverse. For now, a double-dip recession is not our base case, however, it cannot be ruled out if new restrictions fail to contain the virus swiftly.

After factoring new government-imposed restrictions into its forecasts, the European Commission’s Autumn Economic Forecasts predicted the EU economy to shrink 7.4% this year, unchanged from its previous forecast, but expectations for 2021 were cut by 2% from +6.1% to +4.1%. The broad figures, however, mask the very uneven recovery that is playing out, as seen below.

Source: European Commission, BIL

The economic trajectory of individual countries has largely depended upon their ability to keep a lid on the pandemic while, at the same time, countries with manufacturing at the heart of their economy have managed to make a gradual comeback with supply chains mended and export demand picking up. Those countries with service based economies, especially those reliant on tourism, are still in the doldrums: The IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI rose to 54.8 in October, while the Service equivalent came in at 46.9. 50 is the level that separates contraction from expansion.

New mentions of the “R” word, the unevenness of the recovery and the fact that inflation has been in negative territory for three months in a row (most recently -0.3% in October), should spur policymakers into further action.

On the fiscal front, now that the EU Parliament has reached an agreement on the “rule of law conditionality”[1], it is hoped that the EUR 750bn recovery package can start being disbursed before the end of the year.

 On the monetary policy side, the ECB has primed us for even more stimulus at its December meeting. The shape and size of the ECB’s Christmas present is subject to speculation but consensus expects that the EUR 1.35 trillion pandemic emergency purchase program will be expanded by six months until the end of 2021. Since the bond-buying plan was announced in March, the ECB has only used half of the available money. Other predictions include an expansion of the bank’s other asset purchase program which is running parallel to the PEPP, buying EUR 20 billion worth of bonds per month, plus a “temporary envelope” of EUR 120 billion. It’s currently scheduled to run until the end of this year. Cognizant of the weight of negative interest rates on bank balance sheets, it may be expected that the ECB expands its long-term lending scheme to banks rather than taking the scissors to rates. The last thing the eurozone needs is for credit flows to thin.

Then there is the chance that Ms. Lagarde chooses to add her own signature to the policy mix, bringing something entirely new to the table – after all, she did use the word “recalibration” some 20 times at her last press conference. The parcel will be unwrapped on December 10th and the contents had better not be a tangerine or a lump of coal, or else markets could get stroppy.


[1] A clause which states that EU countries must uphold the European rule of law (i.e. judicial independence) or risk losing access to the funds. The specification faced strong opposition from countries such as Hungary and Poland.

Author: Group Investment Office